Æðµã´«Ã½

Final NLRB Joint Employer Rule is a Win for Small Business Community

Labor
Published

In an important win for Æðµã´«Ã½ members and the small business community, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released a final rule that clarifies the standard for determining whether two employers are joint employers of a group of workers under the National Labor Relations Act.

This resolves the NLRB’s controversial 2015 decision in the case of Browning-Ferris Industries that radically expanded the traditional test for establishing joint employment. Today’s final rule specifies that an employer may be considered a joint employer of a separate employer’s employees only if the two employers share or codetermine the employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment, which are exclusively defined as wages, benefits, hours of work, hiring, discharge, discipline, supervision, and direction.

Importantly, the final rule retains the requirement that direct and immediate control over essential terms and conditions of employment be “substantial” to give rise to joint-employer status. Control is substantial if it meaningfully affects matters relating to the employment relationship. Such control is not “ substantial” if it is only exercised on a sporadic, isolated, or de minimis basis.

Indirect influence and contractual reservations of authority are no longer sufficient to establish a joint-employer relationship.

Æðµã´«Ã½ views this NLRB ruling as a positive development because it provides home building firms and small businesses clarity and certainty regarding the joint employer rule by restoring the traditional definition of joint employment in which a company must exercise “direct and immediate control” over a worker in a business-to-business relationship.

In announcing the final rule, NLRB Chairman John Ring said: “With the completion of today’s rule, employers will now have certainty in structuring their business relationships, employees will have a better understanding of their employment circumstances, and unions will have clarity regarding with whom they have a collective-bargaining relationship.”

For more information, contact at 800-368-5242 x8317.

Subscribe to Æðµã´«Ã½Now

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from Æðµã´«Ã½Now

Economics

Jan 23, 2026

Which Local Markets Are Seeing Declines in House Pricing?

Nationally, house prices continued to rise at a modest pace in the third quarter of 2025. However, this national trend masks significant variation across local markets. See which markets have experienced housing price declines in recent quarters.

Advocacy

Jan 22, 2026

Æðµã´«Ã½ Urges Congress to Ease Regulatory Burdens to Help Housing Affordability

The best way to ease the nation’s housing affordability crisis is for policymakers to eliminate excessive regulations that are preventing builders from increasing the housing supply, Æðµã´«Ã½ told Congress today.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jan 23, 2026

In the third quarter of 2025, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported that real gross domestic product (GDP) expanded nationally, with growth recorded across all states and the District of Columbia.

Economics

Jan 22, 2026

Nationally, house prices continued to rise at a modest pace in the third quarter of 2025, as mentioned in our previous quarterly house prices post. However, this national trend masks significant variation across local markets. While many metro areas continued to see house price appreciation, others experienced notable declines following several years of rapid growth.

Economics

Jan 21, 2026

Private residential construction spending was up 1.3% in October, rebounding from a 1.4% decline in September 2025. This modest gain was primarily driven by increased spending on home improvements.